Effect of Diffrent Absorbing Materials on Th Performance of Basin Solar Still Under Libyan Climate Conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51646/jsesd.v2i1.92Keywords:
Solar still , Thermal performance , Painting , Absorbing materials , Water collection , Libyan climateAbstract
This experimental study deals with a single-basin solar still using various absorbing materials with and without black painting. Different types of absorbing materials with and without black painting were used to enhance the solar still productivity through
improvement in absorptivity. Those materials are steel and aluminum with and without black painting and rubber. Two identical solar stills were manufactured using locally available materials. All the results were compared together to reach the best absorbing materials with and without painting that can be used for solar still. It was found that the rubber absorber has the highest water collection during the daytime, followed by the black painted steel absorber, then by black-painted aluminum absorber and steel without painting absorber. The average enhancement in the daily productivity was about 50% for the rubber absorber compared
with the black painted aluminum absorber and about 43% for the rubber absorber compared with the black painted steel absorber.
Downloads
Metrics
References
- S Abdallah, Abu-Khader MM, and Badran O, “Effect of various absorbing materials on the thermal performance of solar stills”, Desalination, vol. 242, 128–137, 2009.
-K. K. Murugavel, and K Srithar, “Performance study on basin type double slope solar still with different wick materials and minimum mass of water” Renewable Energy, vol. 36, 612-620, 2011.
- A. S. Nafey, M. Abdelkader, A. Abdelmotalip, and A. A. Mabrouk, “Enhancement of solar still productivity using floating perforated black plate”, Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 43, 937–946, 2002.
- C. Tiris, M. Tiris and I.E. Türe, “Improvement of basin type solar still performance: Use of various absorber materials and solar collector integration”, Renewable Energy, vol. 9, 758–761, 1996.
- B.A Akash, M.S.Mohsen, O Osta, and Y. Elayan, “Experimental evaluation of a single-basin solar still using different absorbing materials”, Renewable Energy, vol. 14, 307-310, 1998.
- B. Abu-Hijleh and H. Rababa’h, “Experimental study of a solar still with sponge cubes in basin”, Energy Conv. Manage., vol. 44, 1411–1418, 2003.
- A. S. Nafey, M. Abdelkader, A. Abdelmotalip, and A.A. Mabrouk, “Solar still productivity enhancement”, Energy Conv. Manage., vol. 42, 1401–1408, 2001.
-M. Naim and M.A. AbdelKawi, “Nonconventional solar stills. Part 1. Nonconventional solar stills with charcoal particles as absorber medium”, Desalination, vol. 153, 55–64, 2002.
- P. Valsaraj, “An experimental study on solar distillation in a single slope basin still by surface heating the water mass”, Renewable Energy, vol.25, 607-612, 2002.
-M. Sakthivel, and S.Shanmugasundaram, “Effect of energy storage medium (black granite gravel)
on performance of a solar still”, International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 32, 68-82, 2008.
-N. H. A. Rahim, “New method to store heat energy in horizontal solar desalination still”, Renewable Energy, vol. 28, 419-433, 2003.
-A.A. El-Sebaii, S. Aboul-Enein, E. El-Bialy, “Single basin solar still with baff suspended absorber”, Energy Convers. Mgmt., vol. 41, 661–675, 2000
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Solar Energy and Sustainable Development Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.