Enhanced Fuzzy MPPT Controller with Rules Compression for 10 kW Grid-Connected PV System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51646/jsesd.v14i2.1208الكلمات المفتاحية:
MPPT، Power Grid، Fuzzy Logic Controller، FLCالملخص
This paper proposes an enhanced fuzzy logic controller (FLC) for photovoltaic (PV) systems, featuring a novel reduced-order design. It introduces a significantly simplified FLC for MPPT in a 10-kW grid-connected PV system. The proposed controller minimizes both the number of input variables and the number of membership functions (MFs). Specifically, it utilizes only a single input, the sum of conductance and its increment, and employs just five rules, a substantial reduction compared to the 25-49 rules typical in standard FLCs. Integrated within a system architecture featuring a DC-to-DC converter and a 3-level voltage source converter (VSC) for grid power transfer via duty cycle control, this highly reduced FLC maintains robust MPPT performance through adaptive responses to varying weather conditions. Consequently, it achieves considerable simplification in implementation complexity without sacrificing operational efficiency. To our knowledge, this FLC is among the few controllers capable of such significant rule reduction while maintaining performance. Key results show that at 1 kW/m², incremental conductance (IC) achieves 99% efficiency compared to FLC’s 96%. Under medium irradiance (0.5 kW/m²), FLC outperforms IC by 5% (93% vs. 88%). For low irradiance (0.2 kW/m²), both reach 95.2%. Under large irradiance steps (0.4 to 1 kW/m²), the FLC achieves 22× faster convergence than IC (0.015 s vs. 0.33 s), demonstrating superior dynamic response to abrupt solar variations. This highlights the proposed algorithm’s robustness for dynamic weather scenarios while maintaining competitiveness in steady operation.
التنزيلات
المقاييس
المراجع
M. Ali, M. Ahmad, M. A. Koondhar, M. S. Akram, A. Verma, and B. Khan, “Maximum power point tracking for grid-connected photovoltaic system using Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Controller,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 110, p. 108879, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.108879.
S. Danyali, M. Babaeifard, M. Shirkhani, A. Azizi, J. Tavoosi, and Z. Dadvand, “A new neuro- fuzzy controller based maximum power point tracking for a partially shaded grid-connected photovoltaic system,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 17, p. e36747, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024. e36747.
S. J. Yaqoob, S. Motahhir, and E. B. Agyekum, “A new model for a photovoltaic panel using Proteus software tool under arbitrary environmental conditions,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 333, p. 130074, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130074.
M. A. Atillah, H. Stitou, A. Boudaoud, M. Aqil, and A. Hanafi, “Study and analysis of partial shading effect on power production of a photovoltaic string controlled by three different MPPT techniques: P&O, PSO, and ANN,” Math. Model. Comput., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 856–869, 2024, doi: 10.23939/mmc2024.03.856.
W. Alhosaini, M. Aly, E. M. Ahmed, and A. Shawky, “Optimized grid-connected three-phase photovoltaic inverter system using cascaded FOPIT-FOPI fractional controller,” Energy Rep., vol. 13, pp. 3324–3339, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2025.02.055.
N. E. Zakzouk, M. A. Elsaharty, A. K. Abdelsalam, A. A. Helal, and B. W. Williams, “Improved performance low‐cost incremental conductance PV MPPT technique,” IET Renew. Power Gener., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 561–574, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2015.0203.
S. Bouri, O.-A. Mekkaoui, and A. M. Mamem, “Comparative Study of Different MPPT Methods of a Boost Chopper of PV Generator,” Acta Electrotech. Inform., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 24–31, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.2478/aei-2022-0014.
F. Berttahar, S. Abdeddaim, A. Betka, and C. Omar, “A Comparative Study of PSO, GWO, and HOA Algorithms for Maximum Power Point Tracking in Partially Shaded Photovoltaic Systems,” Power Electron. Drives, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 86–105, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.2478/pead-2024-0006.
S. Nawaz, “Design and Simulation of Improved Artificial Neural Netwok and Incremental Conductance HybridMPPT for Solar PV System Under Variable Irradiance Condition,” pp. 1502– 1509, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.04.173.
M. N. Ali, “Improved design of artificial neural network for MPPT of grid-connected PV systems,” in 2018 Twentieth International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON), IEEE, 2018, pp. 97–102. doi: 10.1109/MEPCON.2018.8635202.
M. Atillah, H. Stitou, A. Boudaoud, and M. Aqil, “Comparative Study of Two ANFIS-Based MPPT Controls under uniform and partial shading conditions,” Sol. Energy Sustain. Dev., pp. 89–103, 2024. https://doi.org/10.51646/jsesd.v14iSI_MSMS2E.400
M. M. Refaat, Y. Atia, M. M. Sayed, and H. A. Fattah, “Adaptive Fuzzy Logic Controller as MPPT Optimization Technique Applied to Grid-Connected PV Systems,” in Modern Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques for Photovoltaic Energy Systems, A. M. Eltamaly and A. Y. Abdelaziz, Eds., in Green Energy and Technology. , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 247–281. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-05578-3_9.
J.-K. Shiau, Y.-C. Wei, and B.-C. Chen, “A study on the fuzzy-logic-based solar power MPPT algorithms using different fuzzy input variables,” Algorithms, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 100–127, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/a8020100.
J. Dadkhah and M. Niroomand, “Optimization Methods of MPPT Parameters for PV Systems: Review, Classification, and Comparison,” J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 225–236, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.35833/MPCE.2019.000379.
B. N. Alajmi, K. H. Ahmed, S. J. Finney, and B. W. Williams, “Fuzzy-logic-control approach of a modified hill-climbing method for maximum power point in microgrid standalone photovoltaic system,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1022–1030, 2010, doi
التنزيلات
منشور
كيفية الاقتباس
إصدار
القسم
الرخصة
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2026 Hicham Stitou, Mohamed Amine Atillah, Abdelghani Boudaoud, Mounaim Aqil

هذا العمل مرخص بموجب Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




